Free resource
ERP Data Migration Readiness Scorecard
Use this scorecard before your ERP partner starts loading files. It gives finance, operations and leadership a simple way to see whether the data is ready, half-ready or a cutover risk.
Get the working copy
Enter your details to unlock the editable scorecard. I will get the request notification so I can follow up with scoring guidance. After submit, the CSV working copy will download or open immediately.
No newsletter spam. The form sends me your name, email and the exact resource requested so I can follow up properly.
Your working copy is ready
Your request has also been sent to me with the resource name, so I can follow up with the right migration or reporting notes.
Quick answer
The ERP Data Migration Readiness Scorecard helps SMEs score source inventory, ownership, data quality, mapping, validation, reconciliation, reporting continuity and cutover readiness before ERP test loads begin.
How to score each area
Score each domain from 0 to 2. A score of 0 means the evidence is missing or unclear. A score of 1 means there is partial evidence but unresolved decisions remain. A score of 2 means the evidence exists, owners are named and the work can be tested.
Readiness scorecard
| Area | Score 0 | Score 1 | Score 2 | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source inventory | Sources unknown or hidden in spreadsheets | Main systems listed, side spreadsheets unclear | All sources, extracts and manual files listed | Project lead |
| Data ownership | No named owners for critical domains | Some owners named, sign-off unclear | Owners and deputies named for each data domain | Sponsor |
| Data quality | No issue register | Known issues logged informally | Ranked issue register with owners and retest status | Data owners |
| Mapping rules | Field mapping not started | Critical fields mapped, exceptions open | Source-to-target map approved for critical data | Migration lead |
| Reconciliation | No control totals agreed | Some finance or stock checks planned | Control totals and sample checks agreed | Finance and ops |
| Reporting continuity | Reports not catalogued | Critical reports listed, rebuild unclear | Day-one reports and definitions documented | Reporting owner |
| Cutover readiness | Go/no-go criteria missing | Criteria drafted but unsigned | Criteria agreed with evidence required | Sponsor |
Interpreting the result
- 0-6: high risk. The project is likely to expose basic data and ownership gaps during test loads.
- 7-11: amber. Some controls exist, but unresolved decisions could still delay cutover.
- 12-14: stronger position. The team has enough evidence to run test loads and focus on exceptions.
- Treat any zero in finance, stock, customer, supplier or item data as a leadership risk, even if the total score looks acceptable.
Evidence note
These resources are based on practical ERP migration, data-readiness and reporting-reconciliation controls: named owners, source inventories, issue registers, source-to-target maps, validation evidence and sign-off before leadership relies on the numbers.
Related resources
Digital Adaption helps UK SMEs produce migration readiness packs, data-quality issue registers, owner matrices and reconciliation evidence. Book a data risk call.